I'm not sure if this is due to the way that religious arguments are generally read (by both theists and non-theists): if there is a single issue (however small) that appears not to have been considered by the author then the whole argument will be ignored comfortably. So this compels me to try to outline why potential objections fail, which takes a long time.
Hopefully I'll come back to the blog and write on serious matters again, even if they aren't comprehensive.
Anyway, let me post this now rather than keeping it indefinitely in my "drafts" section!